首页> 外文OA文献 >Is Group Sex a Higher-Risk Setting for HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections Compared With Dyadic Sex Among Men Who Have Sex With Men?
【2h】

Is Group Sex a Higher-Risk Setting for HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections Compared With Dyadic Sex Among Men Who Have Sex With Men?

机译:与男男性接触者中的二元性行为相比,团体性行为是艾滋病毒和其他性传播感染的高发人群吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Group sex has been suggested as a potential high-risk setting for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM). We investigated whether group sex is associated with lower condom use during anal sex and higher proportions of STIs compared with dyadic sex among HIV-negative MSM between 2009 and 2012. Cross-sectional data from 7 data waves of the Amsterdam Cohort Studies were used. The sample consisted of 465 MSM who either reported both group and dyadic sex (at n = 706 visits) or dyadic sex only (at n = 1339 visits) in the preceding 6 months. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to investigate the association between sexual setting (group vs. dyadic sex), condomless anal sex, and STI. Group sex was reported at 35% (706/2045) of visits. Condomless sex was more often reported during dyadic than group sex (odds ratio, 3.64 95% confidence interval, 2.57-5.16). Men who had group sex were more likely diagnosed as having gonorrhea compared with men with dyadic sex (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.97), but this effect was not retained in the multivariate model. Results demonstrate within-person differences in sexual behavior during group and dyadic sex among MSM. Men were more likely to use condoms during group sex than during dyadic sex. Thus, for some, group sex may not necessarily be risky for HIV infection compared with dyadic sex. However, group sex may be a higher-risk setting for acquiring STIs other than HIV, such as gonorrhea. Group sex encounters should be recognized as distinct sexual settings with specific risk characteristics that need to be addressed accordingly
机译:有人认为,在与男性发生性关系(MSM)的男性中,团体性行为是艾滋病毒和其他性传播感染(STI)的潜在高风险环境。我们调查了2009年至2012年之间在HIV阴性MSM中,团体性行为是否与肛门性行为时使用较低的避孕套以及性传播感染的比例高于二元性行为有关。使用了阿姆斯特丹队列研究的7个数据浪的横截面数据。该样本由465名MSM组成,他们在过去6个月中既报告了团体性行为,也报告了性行为(n次访问706次)或仅报告了性行为(n次访问1339次)。使用具有广义估计方程的逻辑回归来研究性环境(群体性与二元性),无避孕套肛交和性传播感染之间的关联。据报道,有35%(706/2045)的人进行了团体性爱。二元组中无避孕套性行为的发生率高于群体性行为(优势比,3.64 95%置信区间,2.57-5.16)。与二项性行为的男性相比,有小组性行为的男性更有可能被诊断为淋病(优势比为1.71; 95%置信区间为1.08-2.97),但是在多变量模型中并未保留这种效应。结果表明,男男性接触者之间在群体行为和二元性行为期间的性行为内部差异。与二元性生活相比,男性在集体性行为中更可能使用安全套。因此,对于某些人来说,与二元性行为相比,群体性行为不一定具有感染HIV的风险。但是,群体性行为可能是获得除艾滋病之外的性传播感染的更高风险的环境,例如淋病。群体性相遇应被视为具有特定风险特征的不同性生活环境,需要相应地解决

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号